Sunday, November 16, 2008
Lysistrata 4
I don't get the whole chorus thing that is featured in the book. Actually, I'm pretty sure the book could do without talk of weaving as a song. I realize that in theater there are choruses that often push the storyline along, but in the case of Lysistrata, they are merely background knowledge that does not help further the storyline at all. I understand they may serve for entertainment purposes, but I honestly just skim through the parts instead of analyzing them like the dialogue between the women in the Akropolis and the men. The chorus scenes are pretty funny, I must say, but the first scene is quite dull and I wanted to shift through it as quickly as possible until we actually discussed it in class. When we did, metaphors for the qualities of men and women were discovered, the fire pots of the men signifying the passion that was burning for the women, and the women's buckets of water that put out the fires and doused the passion of their men. The contrast of the two was impeccable, especially since the women were trying to stay pure as water and resist temptation (fire.) Past that example, I see no reason why the choruses are even relevant.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
haha i agree. i did not enjoy reading the lines by the choruses because they were all 1)really long and 2)really boring. i just lost focus when a chorus line would come up.
haha yes I agree with you as well... The chorus really confused me at times and I'm pretty sure my eyes would just sort of glance over it and get to the dialogue between the characters which I could understand much better... But it was part of Ancient Greek theater and so I guess you cannot do without it..
The chorus is extremly unnecesary and very very boring and conflicting to the story of the play!
Post a Comment